- Tenants Do Not Need to Prove Willful Violation of Chicago Ordinance to Recover Security Deposit Interest, First District Rules
- Three Leading Profession Organizations Have Published a New Guide to Preventing Business Fraud -- If Your Business Has Been a Victim of Fraud Our Experienced Chicago, Naperville, Wheaton and Oak Brook Business Trial Attorneys Can Help Recover Your Losses
- Attorneys May Be Disqualified When Appearing Before a Judge Who is a Former Law Partner
- Chicago Federal District Court Strikes Down Mandatory Arbitration Clause
- Class Certification Allowed Even in Cases With Small Damages
- Evidentiary Hearings in Motions to Disqualify Illinois Attorneys
- Contribution Act Does Not Bar Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim in Embezzlement Case
- Shareholders Cannot Use Attorney Client Privilege to Effect a Freeze-Out
- Trademark Dispute Between Naperville Small Business and National Corporation Can Proceed
- Protect Yourself from Abusive Bill Collectors With the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Our Naperville, Oak Brook, Wheaton and Chicago Lemon Law Attorneys Defeat Motion to Dismiss Breach of Warranty and Fraud Claims Involving an Allegedly Defective RV
- Fallen Investment Bank Socked With Fair Debt Collection Practices Lawsuit
- Our Chicago, Aurora and Joliet Class Action and Consumer Rights Attorneys Can File Suit to End Debt Collector Abuse
- Marketing Fraud Costs Pharmaceutical Maker $62 Million for Settlement
- Using Forensic Accountants and Certified Fraud Examiners in Shareholder, Business, Divorce and Commerical Litigation
- Shareholders Cannot Sue Bank One Officers, Appeals Court Decides
- Will Executor’s Bad Faith Trumps Shareholder Stock Redemption Agreement By Decedent
- Shareholder May Withdraw Complaint, Appeals Court Rules in Corporate Dispute
- LLC Members Owe Company, Manager No Fiduciary Duty, Appeals Court Rules
- Respected Law Professor's Insights on Corporate Freeze-Out Litigation
- Missed Deadline Bars Stolen Corporate Opportunities Claim, Appeals Court Rules
- Court of Appeal Allows Retroactive Rule Change in Junk Fax Insurance Case
- Without Written Confidentiality Agreement, Competing Does Not Breach Fiduciary Duty, Court Rules
- Earnings of Closely Held Company Are Not Marital Property, Appeals Court Says
- Chicago Consumer Attorneys DiTommaso-Lubin Win Precedent in Missouri Class Action
- Company President Has No Standing to Sue Alleged Alter Ego, Appeals Court Rules
- Our Chicago Consumer Attorneys Can Assist in Recovering Money Damages for Consumer Frauds-- Federal Reserve Website Assists in Reporting Consumer Fraud to the Right Agency
- How to Avoid RV and Auto-Fraud -- Chicago Consumer Attorneys Who Can File Suit to Recover Damages for RV and Auto-Fraud and Lemon Automobiles
- Chicago Consumer Attorneys Who Assist in Stopping Debt Collector Abuse
- Mutual Fund Owners May Not Sue Over Excessive Fees, Seventh Circuit Rules
- Seventh Circuit Finds No Duty to Defend For Liability Insurer When Liability Based on Intentional Wrongs
- Illinois Blocked-Crossing Law Is Preempted, State Supreme Court Rules
- Midwest Insurers Have Duty to Defend in Junk Fax Class-Action Suits
- Bond Filing Absolutely Must Precede Attachment Order Under Illinois Attachment Act, Appeals Court Rules
- Federal Judicial Center's "Managing Class Action Litigation: A Pocket Guide for Judges" is an Excellent Research Tool for Class Action Lawyers and Judges
- Seventh Rules Credit Must Be Firm, But Not Valuable Under FCRA
- Tolling Agreement Supersedes Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Case
- The Chicago Consumer Attorneys at DiTommaso-Lubin Win Precedent In Hotel Billing Fraud Case
- Illinois Supreme Court Rules Subcontractors Are Not Subject to Consumer Protection Law
- FACTA Class Actions Grow
- Contract Counterclaim Fails and Sanctions Upheld, Seventh Circuit Rules
- Pennsylvania District Court Certifies Health Club Fee Class Action
- Expose of Illegal Debt Collector Tactics -- FTC Website Summarizes Consumer Right to be Free From Debt Collector Harrassment
- Northern District of Illinois Federal District Judge Rules That Bona Fide Error Defense in a Putative FDCPA Class-Action Must be Pled With Particularity Under Rule 9
