Close

Articles Posted in Illinois Supreme Court

Updated:

Illinois Supreme Court Enters Interim Suspension Against Drew Peterson’s Former Attorney Joel Brodsky — Brodsky’s Own Lawyer Joe “The Shark” Admitted at the Sanctions Hearing that Plaintiff’s Counsel Was Correct and that Brodsky Engaged in “Rambo-Like Tactics”

The Illinois Supreme Court entered an interim suspension order against attorney Joel Brodsky prohibiting him for practicing law in Illinois until further order of the Court.  You can view the order here. You can view the brief of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed in support of the…

Updated:

A Guarantor is Not a Surety Under the Illinois Sureties Act

At Lubin Austermuehle, we pride ourselves on staying abreast of changes in the law that may affect our clients, especially those rendered by the highest court in the state. The Supreme Court of Illinois released a new decision not long ago that was picked up by our Lombard business litigation…

Updated:

Penalty Under Landlord Tenant Ordinance Is Statutory, Illinois Supreme Court Finds

  A recent ruling clarifying how Illinois state law applies to city ordinances caught the attention of our Chicago consumer protection attorneys. In Landis et al v. Marc Realty et al, Ill. Sup. Co. No. 105568 (May 21, 2009), tenants Ana and Ken Landis signed a lease for a Chicago…

Updated:

State Supreme Court Finds Federal Law Preempts Illinois Nursing Home Care Act

As mediation and arbitration attorneys in Chicago, we were interested to see an Illinois Supreme Court decision from this year that clarifies state law’s relationship with the Federal Arbitration Act. Carter v. SCC Operating Company, No. 106511 (Ill. April 15, 2010) (PDF). The plaintiff, Sue Carter, is administering the estate…

Updated:

Illinois Supreme Court Resolves Question on Unintentional Missed Deadlines in Trade Secrets Case

  Our Chicago trade secrets litigation attorneys were interested to see that a trade secrets and breach of restrictive covenant case was responsible for clarifying a point of procedure at the trial level. In Vision Point of Sale v. Haas et al., No. 103140 (Ill. Sup. Co. Sept. 20, 2007),…

Updated:

Illinois Plaintiffs Can Recover Under Promissory Estoppel, Illinois Supreme Court Rules

  Promissory estoppel is an affirmative cause of action in Illinois, the Illinois Supreme Court decided April 2. Newton Tractor Sales v. Kubota Tractor Corporation, Ill. Sup. Co. No. 106798, (April 2, 2009). In this Illinois business lawsuit, the court allowed plaintiff Newton Tractor Sales to continue its lawsuit against…

Updated:

First Amendment Protects Allegedly Defamatory Statements in Men’s Clothing Advertisement, Illinois Supreme Court Rules

  Statements in an advertisement for a men’s clothing retailer may have been in poor taste, but they are still protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled. In Imperial Apparel Ltd. v. Cosmo’s Designer Direct Inc., Ill., No. 103331 (Feb. 7, 2008),…

Updated:

Using Forensic Accountants and Certified Fraud Examiners in Shareholder, Business, Divorce and Commerical Litigation

As Chicago business, shareholder rights and commercial law litigators, we frequently handle cases involving allegations of business fraud or financial mismanagement, often as part of complex business dispute, that require significant expertise in financial issues. When handling a divorce involving a family business or other closely held company, we also…

Updated:

Illinois Blocked-Crossing Law Is Preempted, State Supreme Court Rules

Until recently, under the Illinois Vehicle code (625 ILCS 5/18c–7402(1)(b)), trains that blocked any road crossing for more than 10 minutes were subject to traffic tickets. That law was overturned in January when the state Supreme Court ruled that the blocked-crossing law violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution…

Updated:

Midwest Insurers Have Duty to Defend in Junk Fax Class-Action Suits

The Illinois Supreme Court handed a victory to plaintiffs throughout Illinois with its 2006 ruling in an insurance dispute over whether insurers must cover the costs of a junk fax class action lawsuit for an insured covered for an “advertising injury.” In Valley Forge Insurance Co. v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc.,…

Contact Us