Close

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Recently Settled Lawsuit Over Large Payday Lender’s Use of Non-Compete Agreements Provides Lessons on How to Use Such Agreements — Chicago and Evanston Non-Compete Agreement Attorneys

When non-compete agreements can and cannot be used? One of outgoing attorney general Lisa Madigan’s final acts was to settle a lawsuit the Attorney General’s office had brought against one of the nation’s largest payday lenders Check Into Cash alleging that the lender’s use of non-compete agreements ran afoul of…

Updated:

Oak Forest Properties v. RER Financial, Inc. — Breach of Lease Contract Dispute Resolved — Chicago Real-Estate Litigation Attorneys

Where circuit court did not err when it ordered plaintiff and defendant to each pay their own attorneys’ fees in case for breach of a lease agreement because the plaintiff and defendant both won and lost on some of their claims, and neither party prevailed on claims that were significantly…

Updated:

Mitek v. Diedrich — Trade Secret and Non-Disclosure Agreement Claims Dismissed for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Federal District Court — Chicago Non-Compete Agreement Attorneys Near Oak Brook

A complaint alleging breach of a non-disclosure agreement and misappropriation of trade secrets was successfully dismissed for lack of jurisdiction where the defendant was not alleged to have sold a competing product within the state in which the action was filed. Brad Diedrich worked from May 2003 through September 2017…

Updated:

McIntosh v. Walgreens Boots Alliance — Illinois Appellate Court Finds Voluntary Payment Doctrine Does Not Defeat Consumer Fraud Claims

The Illinois Appellate Court reversed a decision by the Illinois Circuit Court in a class action concerning the Consumer Fraud Act, where a retailer was alleged to have improperly collected taxes on exempt bottled water products. The court found that the voluntary payment doctrine did not apply to a payment…

Updated:

Invado v. Forward Science Distribution — District Court Allows Trade Secrets Theft Case to Proceed — Parties Later Enter Judgment in Favor of Defendant — Top Chicago Copyright Lawyers — Chicago Trade Secret Attorneys

A maker of medical devices was denied on its motion to dismiss a complaint alleging breach of a confidentiality agreement and breach of the Defend Trade Secrets Act. The court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged facts showing that the defendant misappropriated confidential information to bring a rival product…

Updated:

DiTommaso Lubin’s Lawyers Named Super Lawyers and Rising Stars in 2019

  Super Lawyers named Chicago and Oak Brook business trial attorney Peter Lubin a Super Lawyer in the Categories of Class Action, Business Litigation, and Consumer Rights Litigation. Patrick Austermuehle of the Firm was named a Rising Star again.  Peter Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle have consistently won this honor which…

Updated:

Cilliers v. Cobalt Northern District of Illinois Opinion on Deceptive Purchase of Intellectual Property

A technology company that was accused of purchasing intellectual property and assets in a deceptive manner was denied its motion to dismiss a complaint against it for breach of contract and fraud. The plaintiffs alleged that the technology company deceived them, inducing them to sell their assets and intellectual property…

Updated:

7th Circuit Opinion in Beaton v. SpeedyPC Affirming Class Certification Order

Where district court did not err when it certified a class of consumers of software that promised to improve the function of their computers, and then ran worthless fixes. The appellate panel found that the class requirements were satisfied because all consumers saw the same advertisements, and the software allegedly…

Updated:

Common Defenses and Privileges to Defamation

Being sued for defamation can be a costly and anxiety-inducing experience. It is essential to understand a bit about what defamation (also referred to sometimes as libel or slander) is and importantly what some of the common defenses and privileges to such a claim are. However, there is no substitute…

Updated:

7th Circuit Upholds $50,000 Sanction of Drew Peterson’s Former Attorney Joel Brodsky

The 7th Circuit Opinion affirming the $50,000 sanction of attorney Joel Brodsky issued.  In upholding the $50,000 sanction against attorney Joel Brodsky, the 7th Circuit concluded: “Brodsky’s egregious behavior, obvious on the face of the record and emphasized at length by the court, more than justified the court’s choice of…

Contact Us
Start Chat