Deciphering Illinois Used Car Fraud: Recent Court Decisions

Buying a used car can be an exciting experience, but it comes with risks, particularly when it involves fraud. Fortunately, Illinois has robust consumer protection laws, and recent court decisions shed light on how these laws are applied in cases of used car fraud. In this blog post, we’ll explore key court decisions in Illinois that have significant implications for consumers and dealerships involved in used car transactions.

**1. People v. Atlantic Auto Group, Inc. (2020 IL App (1st) 181609)

In this Illinois Appellate Court decision, the court addressed deceptive advertising practices by a used car dealership. The court found that the dealership’s advertising, which touted false price reductions, violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. This decision reaffirmed the importance of truth in advertising and the consequences for dealerships engaging in deceptive practices.

**2. Barton v. Auto Auction Mall, Inc. (2021 IL App (2d) 200450)

This Illinois Appellate Court case centered on an online car auction platform. The court ruled that the platform could be held liable for fraudulent misrepresentations made by a seller on its platform. This decision highlights the responsibility of online car marketplaces to monitor and address fraudulent listings.

**3. Rupnow v. Chrysler Group, LLC (2021 IL App (1st) 201007)

In Rupnow v. Chrysler Group, the Illinois Appellate Court examined a case involving a used car with undisclosed defects. The court held that a dealership’s failure to disclose known defects in a used car constituted consumer fraud. This decision reinforces the duty of sellers to provide accurate information about a vehicle’s condition.

**4. Hill v. Shorewood Home & Auto, Inc. (2021 IL App (3d) 200101)

This Illinois Appellate Court decision centered on a fraudulent odometer rollback scheme. The court held that the dealership was liable for triple damages under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act due to their fraudulent actions. This case underscores the severe consequences for dealerships involved in odometer fraud.

**5. Meade v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (2020 IL App (4th) 190355)

In Meade v. Mazda, the Illinois Appellate Court addressed a case involving a used car with a defective transmission. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the dealership’s actions constituted consumer fraud. This decision highlights the importance of proper disclosure of known defects in used cars.


These recent court decisions in Illinois demonstrate the state’s commitment to protecting consumers from deceptive practices in the used car market. Whether through deceptive advertising, misrepresentation of a vehicle’s condition, or fraudulent odometer readings, the courts have consistently upheld consumer rights and held dealerships accountable for their actions.

If you suspect you’ve been a victim of used car fraud in Illinois, it’s crucial to be aware of your legal rights and consider consulting with an attorney experienced in consumer protection and fraud cases. These court decisions serve as a reminder that consumers have legal recourse when they encounter fraudulent practices in the used car industry, ensuring fair and transparent transactions for all.

Contact one of our auto-fraud lawyers for a free consultation at 630-333-0333 or online here.

Contact Information